Interactive Modern Warfare 2 Weapons Chart
Two weeks ago, thanks to Denkirson, we posted a Modern Warfare 2 weapons damage chart. Well now he has gone one better and created a interactive flash version.
There is a bigger version to feast your eyes on here
[source denkirson.xanga.com]
tl;dr version: Damn near every gun shoots super fast with very little to no recoil so it doesn’t matter which you use.
[Reply]
your work is very appreciated by the community
keep it up and see you in game
[Reply]
Nice work on this info. Btw check out my new modern warfare 2 online tips, just thought they would help a few people! Enjoy!
[Reply]
Nice job man. Very helpful. Keep up the good work!
[Reply]
Thanks so much!
[Reply]
I really don’t understand IW when it comes to false weapon charts, they had it back in COD 4, and why the f**k do they do it again? It just shows incompetence, such a acclaimed game developer as IW does not have to reslove to this sort of medi|ocrity. Is there a secret agenda for why the game itself can’t show us the correct weapon charts?
I used Denkirson back in COD4, I am using him now on MW2 and would not be surprised at all if I’ll have to use his charts on MW3.
When it comes to weapon damage COD4 beats MW2 in every way.
In MW2 you die way too fast, this is of course a blessing for the average noob who can’t hold their aim on there target for more than 1 second. This also results in way much more campers.
Most assault rifles in MW2 beats all the SMGs in every way, more damage, range and less recoil. Using SMGs in MW2 is almost pointless, I still do it from time to time because I want variety.
In COD4 the SMGs could have tactical advantage if you used them right, I used to be stellar in close quarters with the silenced MP5. No way in hell if I can play the same way with the MP5K or any other SMG in MW2, good bye semi.aggressive rushing.
I still like and enjoy MW2, and I’m going to play it until MW3 comes out. I’m not trolling just because I point out some of the flaws with the game. I hope the next Modern Warfare will be more like C0D4 when it comes to weapon damage. They don’t to make the game to scrub friendly.
No skilled scrub replys: ” u suck in mw2, stop crying and go back to cod4″
I don’t suck in MW2 as I have a K/D of 7.26 and rising, and I still do play the brilliant COD4. Merry Christmas, now f**k off.
[Reply]
Iceman Reply:
December 30th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
@Ghost, In no way am I bashing your opinion of MW2 but the developers even said in the beginning they were trying to make this one more realistic and well in reall life you don’t life through too many shots in center mass.
I am like you and in CoD4 liked being shot first and still able to kill the scrub but this one makes you think more and not just be quicker.
[Reply]
YimYimYimi Reply:
December 31st, 2009 at 12:49 am
@Iceman, I’m 100% sure they were going for a more movie-like feel. Less realism, more entertainment. Unless you can find a reliable article saying otherwise, you’re wrong.
[Reply]
Iceman Reply:
December 31st, 2009 at 1:12 pm
@YimYimYimi, Ok well perhaps I did word that wrong and like you said it is supposed to be like an action movie.
“We go for authenticity not realism…. We want it to look real like an action movie.” – Infinity Ward’s Vince Zampella
Now my question is how many action war movies show someone getting shot more than 3 times and living let alone standing there to shoot your gun?
So while the aim is not realism it is movies and well movies are more realistic (while not completely) than you get shot 5 times and still are able to turn around and shoot the guy as in CoD4
Chuck U Farley Reply:
January 8th, 2010 at 6:37 pm
@Ghost, wow you’re a massive faggot
[Reply]
ug bug Reply:
June 12th, 2010 at 6:58 am
@Ghost, K/D of 7.26 hmmmm sounds like you’re either lying or a camper
[Reply]
Happy camper in a corner Reply:
July 13th, 2010 at 5:48 am
@ug bug, Super Liar or SUPER CAMPER.
[Reply]
http://modernwarfare2.net/modern-warfare-2-will-put-entertainment-over-realism/ right there
[Reply]
i dont get the bit at the bottom left. Its always the same it seems to be 56 damage for a headshot and 40 for a body, I assume that was for a specific gun and it hasnt been updated for all.
[Reply]
“oh man i hate realism! i should be able to turn around and kill the person who has been shooting at me for 5 minutes ! rawr rawr rawr! bullets should have less damage….. “( exaggerated quote) what the f**k. i dont know if you’ve ever played battlefield bad company where they gave you an M16 clip with 50 bullets and it took 20 of those to kill someone….but please don’t make them bring that kind of bulls**t to call of duty.
-get good.
[Reply]
doesnt the aug have a 32-bullet clip and doesnt the desert eagle only have a 7-bullet clip?
[Reply]